The commitment of politicians and others to the integrity of the United States Constitution has been questioned in recent years. This is a serious concern. Those who understand the significance of the Constitution will be concerned about the means for defending it.
This is an emotional issue for many Americans, and the recent proliferation of armed citizen militias across the country has drawn attention to it.
It makes sense to think practically about how to ensure the integrity of the Constitution.
[This post has been updated and re-published due to the timeliness of the topic.]
Here we have a question of means and ends. Destructive forcefulness will easily cause precisely the opposite of its’ intended purpose.
It was Hayek who said, “the principle that the ends justify the means is in individualist ethics regarded as the denial of all morals.”
In my view, Harry Emerson Fosdick stated this truth most clearly: “He who chooses the beginning of the road chooses the place it leads to. It is the means that determine the end.”
Ayn Rand drove the point home emphatically in her own indomitable style: “An attempt to achieve the good by force is like an attempt to provide a man with a picture gallery at the price of cutting out his eyes.”
Americans can understand this logic. In the midst of conflict nothing is more important than a clear mind. Yet, we human beings are emotional creatures, and the less disciplined have always been capable of emotion-driven violence.
So, let’s take a look at the way incivility and antagonism—and especially the threat of violence—will actually subvert our own interests and intentions. I will suggest four reasons here, as follows.
First, force—or the threat of force—subverts the Constitution itself, immediately destroying its’ capacity to function as written and effectively nullifying its existence.
The Founders created a structure for governance that depends on civility, moral responsibility, and collaboration. The Founders expected Americans to behave with ethical integrity in the service of their country, and several of them stated this expectation emphatically.
Second, hostile action by a few individuals would make it difficult, even impossible, for rational and disciplined strategies to be mounted effectively. It could actually set back the cause of the perpetrators themselves—for years, even decades.
Why? The use of force would harden the attitudes of most Americans toward the perceived purpose or philosophy of the instigators. This would make it difficult to win a fair hearing from anyone who respects the rule of law.
Third, any rebellion by force of arms pits itself against the uniformed services—law-enforcement agencies and the National Guard. These are our sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, and sworn defenders of the Constitution.
Individual members of militias need to understand who exactly they intend to fight, and who they wish to attract and win over to their cause.
Fourth, the vast majority of Americans value the character of the United States deeply. They recognize the essential role of the Constitution in making America a safe, productive, and meaningful country to live in.
If we wish Americans to have a better understanding of how the Constitutional structure of governance should function, it will not be accomplished by beating them up.
Influencing hearts and minds requires the rational exchange of information—accurate information. This means teaching our values, demonstrating basic virtues in our actions, and learning how to communicate effectively.
Not only do we depend on civil order for the safety of our families, for safe streets, jobs, schools and hospitals, but there is a fundamental principle involved: We cannot defend what we believe in by tearing it down.
To preserve the Constitution and renew the strength of the United States we will need to address our countrymen with clear reasoning presented compellingly, and in a composed and rational manner.
The Constitution will last far into the future if, and only if, Americans stand by it with steadfast adherence to the rule of law, and to the values (and virtues) the Founders expected of us.
You may watch for the next post on or about March 16.