We find ourselves now at a turning point, confronted by the consequences of the past and the anger and confusion of the present. Yet, this is an opportunity – a time that calls for clarity of purpose, and for coming to terms with the history that brought us here.
It is not political change that I speak of, but a far more profound transition. We are confronted with questions of principle, of values, of the meaning of moral responsibility.
Such concerns often come into sharper focus amidst disruption and conflict.
Answers do not come easily, but history leaves silent lessons etched in our national experience.
In my view, we have lost a sense of purpose, and thus the conceptual framework upon which rational judgment depends. This has made us vulnerable both to our own vices and to the predatory interests and manipulative power of institutions that know our weaknesses.
We have indulged ourselves increasingly over time in our attraction to meaningless spectacle and thoughtless voyeurism – a wasteland of sex, violence, greed and materialism.
In his recent book, The Great Degeneration, economic historian Niall Ferguson provides a persuasive view of what has come to pass in the United States. He considers four areas in which the degeneration of values and loss of social stability have had devastating consequences.
In my own words these are: 1) the loss of personal and social responsibility, 2) the disintegration of the market economy, 3) the role of the rule of law, and 4) the essential qualities of civil society.
Dr. Ferguson reminds us of past strengths, and in particular the vigorous civil and cultural life of nineteenth century America.
“I want to ask,” he writes, “how far it is possible for a truly free nation to flourish in the absence of the kind of vibrant civil society we used to take for granted? I want to suggest that the opposite of civil society is uncivil society, where even the problem of anti-social behavior becomes a problem for the state.”
He goes on to cite Alexis de Tocqueville from his famous commentary, Democracy in America, published in 1840:
“America is, among the countries of the world, the one where they have taken most advantage of association and where they have applied that powerful mode of action to a greater diversity of objects.
“Independent of the permanent associations created by law under the names of townships, cities and counties, there is a multitude of others that owe their birth and development only to the individual will.
“The inhabitant of the United States learns from birth that he must rely on himself to struggle against the evils and obstacles of life; he has only a defiant and restive regard for social authority and he appeals to its authority only when he cannot do without it….
“In the United States, they associate for the goals of public security, of commerce and industry, of morality and religion. There is nothing the human will despairs of attaining by the free action of the collective power of individuals.”
Dr. Ferguson writes that “Tocqueville saw America’s political associations as an indispensable counterweight to the tyranny of the majority in modern democracy. But it was the non-political associations that really fascinated him.”
Consider Tocqueville’s description:
“Americans of all ages, all conditions, all minds constantly unite. Not only do they have commercial and industrial associations in which all take part, but they also have a thousand other kinds: religious, moral, grave, futile, very general and very particular, immense and very small; Americans use associations to give fêtes, to found seminaries, to build inns, to raise churches, to distribute books…. Finally, if it is a question of bringing to light a truth or developing a sentiment with the support of great example, they associate.”
What happened? Once upon a time Americans succeeded in overcoming the constraints to freedom through their own initiative and a sense of community.
Today inaction has replaced action. A once vibrant culture of engagement has been replaced by a self-centered attitude and the isolating influences of technology, mass media, and corporate society.
Will we recreate what we once did so well? Shall we rebuild the American spirit and character to meet the challenges ahead?
A Note to Readers: A project description and a draft introduction to the book can be found on this page. Please look for the next post on or about March 10.